HELPMEFIND PLANTS COMMERCIAL NON-COMMERCIAL RESOURCES EVENTS PEOPLE RATINGS
|
|
-
-
Rose Listing Omission
Alberic-looking rambler, found rose
Hello, I would like to create a rose file about a rambling rose I found in an abandoned orchard/vegetable garden. After taking cuttings and observing it, I am not totally sure it is Albéric, Gardenia, Fraulein Octavia Hesse, La Perle... I also found a similar Albéric type of rose on another location, with some differences visible on both original and cutting. Maybe it would be a good idea creating two files, but I don't have many pictures of the second rose. This would help me gathering information as well as other members' opinions. Best regards, Thomas.
|
REPLY
|
Thomas, would you take a look at my photo in the Alberic Barbier file:
Rose photo courtesy of Patricia Routley 'Alberic Barbier' 005 right; with 'Excelsa' left. Own roots at Northcliffe, W.A. Feb 24, 2013. Provenance of 'Alberic Barbier', P.T., SA in 2007. Leaves. Uploaded 26 OCT 13
I find the the foliage is most distinctive. The leaflets are long and flat with only the midrib showing any indentation. If your roses seem to have a different leaf, give us their proposed “study names” and we will open pages for them.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
17 JUN 23 by
ThomasR
Patricia, the leaves seem to match your description, plus glandular hairs on the rachis and hooked prickles under. I had read that you noticed it was almost thornless, as written in an early description. The rambler I am growing is prickly, not impressively but enough to be defensive, and I tend to be more careful about touching it than Double Scotch Rose as an example. Here are the other points that I noticed and that make me uncertain about it : -Rambler1 and Rambler2 showed consistently this difference on both original and cutting : Rambler1 quite is hard-petalled, especially in the center. It is exceptional to catch a glimpse of what could be a stamen. Center petals/petaloids are softer on Rambler2, and you can see some stamens. -Original Rambler2 is showing a more weeping habit but it maybe due to it growing within a cypress hedge, as opposed to original Rambler1 in unpruned spindles and fig trees. I will search through my files and add pictures as soon as I can. Thank you !
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 4 posted
17 JUN 23 by
ThomasR
Picture from the original Rambler1.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
17 JUN 23 by
ThomasR
Rambler 1 clone from cutting (2 years old). The flowers are wonderfully crumpled, more than the Albéric Barbier pictures I see but maybe the difference is too subtle. There are other roses I am investigating, like François Poisson... It is not clear to me yet.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Is “Jaycee Park” ‘Danse du Feu’?
The “AGAINSTs”: Leaves The pollen parent of ‘Danse du Feu’ (syn ‘Spectacular’) is said to be a multiflora seedling. I am fairly sure “Jaycee Park” is ‘Danse du Feu’ but the leaves are broad-ended, deep green and thick and shiny leaves. They do not look like multiflora leaves. And yet I can see those same deep green leaves of my foundling in Botanica’s p563 full page photo; and in Beales 1988 p86 photo; and also in the excellent illustration in Michael Gibson’s 1980 p179 illustration. Perhaps Norman Young was right when he wrote (1971 ref) “‘Danse du Feu’ and ‘Gruss an Teplitz’ are mongrels which cannot be placed in any botanical class.”
Petals The number of thick petals on “Jaycee Park” has been counted as 16. I will have to re-count next spring because early references for ‘Danse du Feu’ has been counted as 35 (1957 ref), 30-35 (1965 ref) and 23 (Harkness 1967). Jack Harkness I trust. Of course the original plant has probably had no food for decades and my plants are still less than a year old. They may yet increase their petal count.
Hips. There was only one mention of hips – and that was from Jack Harkness in 1978 where he gave them a 3 rating (on an ascending scale of merit from 1 to 10). At least he saw hips and so far I haven’t. Actually the Patent for 'Danse du Feu' says it sets no hips.
Colour There are many references which mention orange in the colour. Too many to ignore, but I have not seen any orange at all in my scarlet-red blooms.
The FORs: Colour I am reassured by the colour of the photos in the 1980, 1988 and 1998 references. “Jaycee Park” starts out as an arterial blood colour and changes later to a veinal blood colour – and I think that is a b….y good colour description. This change of colour to crimson purple (as in my photo 549 038) is confirmed in many references.
Stripe A china stripe in my rose is visible in the 1988 reference photo, and it is also mentioned in the 2000 reference.
Petals. Those broad heart-shaped petals which roll longitudinally to form tubes (and which led me up the garden path with ‘Red-Letter Day’ for a while there) have not been seen in any photos of ‘Danse du Feu’, although the Beales 1988 photo comes close with the straight edge of the petal. The tube-like petals were seen mainly in my new potted plants and rarely on the original bush.
Buds The buds are medium size, pointed and ovoid. In the 1998 reference for 'Danse du Feu' they are said to be “short”.
Season “Jaycee Park repeats, as does ‘Danse du Feu’.
Disease The foundling is certainly susceptible to black spot, more so than most of my roses here. The leaves look to be thick and almost immune, but they quickly succumb and the 1998 reference confirms this susceptibility.
Foliage The foliage looks identical. I am comparing my photos 549 020 and 549 019 and 549 032 with those wonderful 1980, 1988 and 1998 illustrations where the deep green, broad-ended leaves are shown with some clarity.
……….. Latet edit: conserving information on this foundling before deleting it and then merging with ‘Danse du Feu’. Found by Patricia Routley, 2013 on old garden site, now called Jaycee Park, Manjimup, Western Australia. RECEPTACLE Smooth. Slender, narrowing at the rim. INFLORESCENCE Possibly small clusters. Certainly two flowers from the same point in my photo no. 23 BUD - colour Dark red. Medium size. Pointed. Ovoid. Not large or long or slender. BLOOM FORM Semi double. The young plants still in pots have more cactus-shaped blooms than the original bush had. Petals roll longitudinally to form ‘tubes’. BLOOM PETALS 16 thick, broad, heart-shaped. Edges roll under BLOOM COLOUR A change to dusky vinous pink (as in Tea Roses, p206) occurs in old blooms in hot weather BLOOM PEDICEL Stiff. Almost smooth, but a few glands BLOOM ANTHER Colour brown BLOOM FILAMENT Colour Cream = BLOOM STAMEN or male organ 8mm BLOOM STIGMAS Colour cream to pale brown BLOOM STYLES Colour red = BLOOM PISTIL or female organ 4mm Free HIP. Pedicels are dropping off with no hip set LEAVES Five. dark green, thick, shiny. Deeply serrated. CANES. Young - green. PRICKLES Possibly caducous. Newer canes have many prickles
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
8 MAY 23 by
ThomasR
Hi Patricia, I came upon your comment while trying to identify a rose that could be Danse Du Feu (or Soraya Cl ?). What stroke me with the rose I am investigating, apart from the orange/purple shade, is the mass of white/pale stigmas surrounded by a row of yellow anthers, as in the 1955 picture (where it looks yellower than in my picture). Best regards, Thomas.
|
REPLY
|
You have made a most interesting point Thomas. We are just entering winter here (with no blooms) but I will make a diary note to photograph the stigmas on my foundling next season. From memory, it was the photographed leaf of ‘Danse du Feu’ in the literature which led me to my identification.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
9 MAY 23 by
ThomasR
There are pictures of Danse du Feu, Soraya and Soraya Cl, including botanical boards, on the Roseraie de l'Hay/Rosiers du Val de Marne's website. Although the roses look different on botanical boards, it is still confusing to notice the similarities between these roses when focusing on the blooms, especially considering their color was considered new at the time ! And their lineages are so different !
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Hi it appears there are two different clones on the market. The pink one might be ‘ Princesse Marie ‘ mislabeled.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
1 NOV 22 by
ThomasR
Hi, have you grown or seen Princesse Louise ? I was reading about it while hoping to identify a found rose. The 1836 reference seems to include it in the 'Autumnal Flowering Roses' and I was wondering if anyone noticed some reblooming.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
For those who are interested in that rose, there is a documentary called Roses and Climbers &Creepers (from the series Great British Garden Revival) that shows a splendid Adelaide d'Orléans growing at Mottisfont Abbey. There are beautiful pictures of that rose but the quick view (at 9 minutes from the beginning) of it in the video is striking. In his 1991 book Graham Stuart Thomas is recommending to train it on an arch or on a tree.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
23 AUG 22 by
Duchesse
went to see your recommendation for adelaide d'orleans, now I have to buy a bucket of white paint for my garden bench, to get the same effect of the one they are sitting on.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
1 NOV 22 by
ThomasR
Hello, I didn't connect for a long time but I hope you will love that rose. I do not grow it because I have no structure to train it on but I was tempted after seeing it in the documentary !
|
REPLY
|
|
|